wricaplogo

Overview: Mon, May 06

Daily Agenda

Time Indicator/Event Comment
11:3013- and 26-wk bill auction$70 billion apiece
12:50Barkin (FOMC voter)On the economic outlook
13:00Williams (FOMC voter)Speaks at Milken Institute conference
15:00STRIPS dataApril data

US Economy

Federal Reserve and the Overnight Market

Treasury Finance

This Week's MMO

  • MMO for May 6, 2024

     

    Last week’s Fed and Treasury announcements allowed us to do a lot of forecast housekeeping.  Net Treasury bill issuance between now and the end of September appears likely to be somewhat higher on balance and far more volatile from month to month than we had previously anticipated.  In addition, we discuss the implications of the unexpected increase in the Treasury’s September 30 TGA target and the Fed’s surprising MBS reinvestment guidance. 

Rules of Thumb

Ben Bernanke

Fri, October 19, 2007

For example, Bill wrote a Federal Reserve staff paper titled "Rules-of-Thumb for Guiding Monetary Policy" (Poole, 1971).  Because his econometric analysis of the available data indicated that money demand was more stable than aggregate demand, Bill formulated a simple rule that adjusted the money growth rate in response to the observed unemployment rate.  Bill was also practical in noting the pitfalls of mechanical adherence to any particular policy rule; in this study, for example, he emphasized that the proposed rule was not intended "to be followed to the last decimal place or as one that is good for all time [but] . . . as a guide--or as a benchmark--against which current policy may be judged" (p. 152).

Janet Yellen

Mon, January 22, 2007

Using a standard rule of thumb, the unemployment rate should have been essentially unchanged, given the 3 percent growth rate the economy has averaged over the past four quarters.

Donald Kohn

Thu, April 13, 2006

A rough estimate puts the reduction in real GDP growth from the increases in energy prices since late 2003 at between 1/2 percent and 1 percent per year.

Ben Bernanke

Tue, April 04, 2006

The surge in energy prices since late 2003 has significantly reduced the purchasing power of households and decreased the profits of non-energy firms, thereby restraining both consumer spending and business investment. By rough estimate, these increases in energy prices have probably reduced real GDP growth between 1/2% and 1% per year over this period. Although some of this loss in output will be made up in the longer run as the U.S. economy adjusts to higher energy prices, the level of productivity is likely to remain lower than it otherwise would have been, as firms use less energy per worker.

Anthony Santomero

Wed, April 06, 2005

Academic research has shown that estimates of NAIRU are very imprecise and are subject to significant standard deviations…My own research department estimated that the NAIRU was between 3.4 and 5.9 percent between 1983 and 2004 with a 95 percent confidence level. This is a fairly wide band of uncertainty. The problem is that estimates with this level of imprecision are of limited use when conducting monetary policy. When policymakers are attempting to evaluate whether there is still slack in the labor market, or if any further decrease in unemployment may lead to inflationary pressures, it clearly would be preferable to have more precise estimates of NAIRU.

MMO Analysis