wricaplogo

Overview: Mon, May 20

Daily Agenda

Time Indicator/Event Comment
07:30Bostic (FOMC voter)
Appears on Bloomberg television
08:45Bostic (FOMC voter)Gives welcoming remarks at Atlanta Fed conference
09:00Barr (FOMC voter)Speaks at financial markets conference
09:00Waller (FOMC voter)
Gives welcoming remarks
10:30Jefferson (FOMC voter)
On the economy and the housing market
11:3013- and 26-wk bill auction$70 billion apiece
14:00Mester (FOMC voter)
Appears on Bloomberg television
19:00Bostic (FOMC voter)Moderates discussion at financial markets conference

US Economy

Federal Reserve and the Overnight Market

Treasury Finance

This Week's MMO

  • MMO for May 20, 2024

     

    This week’s MMO includes our regular quarterly tabulations of major foreign bank holdings of reserve balances at the Federal Reserve.  Once again, FBOs appear to have compressed their holdings of Fed balances by nearly $300 billion on the latest (March 31) quarter-end statement date.  As noted in the past, we think FBO window-dressing effects are one of a number of ways to gauge the extent of surplus reserves in the banking system at present.  The head of the New York Fed’s market group earlier this month highlighted a few others, which we discuss this week as well.  The bottom line on all of these measures is that any concerns about potential reserve stringency are still a very long way off.

Long-term Rates/Yield Gap

William Poole

Mon, December 18, 2000

A couple of weeks ago I had the very pleasant experience of touring the Boeing F-18 assembly plant and had about thirty minutes in the simulator for an F-18. I must say I'm a lot happier sitting around this table than I am in an F-18! But in the process of trying to land that plane in the simulator of the aircraft carrier, I ended up producing what the instructor called "pilot-induced oscillation." [Laughter] That means finding oneself wobbling first one way and then the other way. And I think we have some of the same concerns about monetary policy.

We don't want to produce a Fed-induced policy oscillation. I think that is part of our concern. In my view we don't have that situation in front of us for the following reason: Policy is really positioned very much on one side at the present time. Adjusted for risk, the federal funds rate is the highest rate in the market. Back in May when we raised it to 6-1/2 percent, some rates were above and some rates were below. The funds rate was pretty much in the middle and there was room for rates to move substantially in either direction. Right now, if we have a resurgence in the economy, there is room for longer-term rates to rise by 150 to 200 basis points without our doing anything. We're not forecasting a resurgence but if that happens, there's lots of room for rates to rise.  I don't think there's much room for the market to take rates lower. Outside of a recession situation, I don't think one could find in the data a term structure more inverted than the one we have now. So it seems to me that positioning ourselves in the middle requires that we ease a bit. There would still be a lot of room then for rates to rise without a move by us, if it turns out that the economy is about to rebound.

Alan Greenspan

Fri, April 14, 2000

But, as I have noted previously, while time preference may appear to be relatively stable over history, perceptions of risk and uncertainty, which couple with time preference to create discount factors, obviously vary widely, as does liquidity preference, itself a function of uncertainty.

<<  1 2 3 4 5 [6

MMO Analysis